ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Judicial Council has rejected a grievance of misconduct in opposition to Justice Qazi Faez Isa over writing letters to President Dr Arif Alvi over proceedings in opposition to him for allegedly not disclosing international properties in his wealth assertion.
A show-cause discover was issued to the Supreme Court judge on July 18 for writing letters after a presidential reference was filed in opposition to him.
The SJC had requested Justice Isa to elucidate his conduct for writing letters to the president of Pakistan.
In Might, President Alvi authorised the submitting of references with the SJC in opposition to Justice Isa and Sindh Excessive Courtroom’s Justice KK Agha for allegedly not disclosing their international properties of their wealth statements.
Consequently, Justice Isa had written a letter to President Alvi looking for readability relating to the reviews that the federal government had filed a reference in opposition to him over allegations of misconduct. Copies of the letter have been despatched to Prime Minister Imran Khan and the apex court docket as properly.
Within the second letter to the president, the SC judge once more requested a duplicate of the reference filed in opposition to him. He additionally expressed his issues over the alleged media marketing campaign in opposition to him.
It’s learnt that the SJC within the second show-cause discover relating to writing letters to the president, had additionally charged Justice Isa over “insinuations in opposition to state establishments”.
A senior authorities official revealed that really Justice Isa had written three letters to the president. Apparently, his third letter, which he wrote on June 12 and complained concerning the alleged media trial, is but to be made public.
Justice Isa, in his third letter, complained that neither he nor the prime minister replied, nor despatched him a duplicate of the reference. Nonetheless, an unsigned doc which purports to be the reference is obtainable on the media, he added.
The Supreme Court judge stated that if due course of was adopted, public disclosure was not made and the matter left to the council, there can be no problem. “Nonetheless, conducting my media trial is in clear breach of constitutional provisions,” he stated.